Love, New York style
Now, AdFreak would never suggest that, by introducing wedding coverage, the Post is really going head-to-head with the Grey Lady (though their weekend real estate section, like the Times' newly redesigned one, rocks), but just think of the possibilities of the outlandish, sometimes outrageous Post offering up the wedding stories of actual New Yorkers. Though the Times has certainly become more democratic in its coverage—couples need no longer be members of the Social Register, or heterosexual for that matter—the Post is bound to bring a whole new spin to New York marriage. We got a taste from surfing through a small sampling of married couples who are already featured on the Post’s site. They included a UPS driver from Queens and a couple whose wedding reception was crashed by an Elvis impersonator. —Posted by Catharine P. Taylor |
|
December 1, 2004 | Permalink |
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I think the Post's wedding coverage will be (curiously enough), less agenda-driven. Here in Boston, we are treated to the Globe pages that would lead one to believe that fully 25% of weddings are between folks of the same gender. Every social service agency manager, public interest lawyer and potter in Somerville and Jamaica Plain have their nuptials covered. Woe betide the poor slob selling printers at CompUSA or driving a truck for Staples however. His/her wedding will never make it by the politically-correct screeners at El Globo. Rather than seeing the world as it is, they see it as it ought to be.
Rick Peterson, Duxbury, MA
Posted by: Rick | Dec 6, 2004 10:40:42 AM
To submit a comment, please click here.












