If you got ’em, don’t smoke ’em
Maybe we should all move to Auckland.
This week, New Zealand snuffed out efforts by its Health Ministry to automatically give an R rating to movies that show smoking—a proposal that would essentially equate cigarettes with graphic violence, explicit language and full-frontal nudity.
The same concept has been gaining support in this hemisphere. But despite all its perceived tongue-rotting, finger-staining evilness, Big Tobacco was ahead of its critics this year. Ditching the benefits of product placement, Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds actually requested that Hollywood remove any specific cigarette-brand imagery from its movies (at least in time for the DVD).
All of which feels a bit hysterical. Would the guys in American Graffiti really have smoked gas-station generics rather than Camels? Didn’t Marlboros seem significant in Apocalypse Now? Would Jim Jarmusch even have a career?
To appease the nonsmokers, perhaps theaters could show more anti-smoking ads instead. That would be reasonable—assuming there’s enough time between the Pepsi spot and the “visit our concessions stand” song.
—Posted by Randi Schmelzer
Photo: Newscom
|
|
December 28, 2004 | Permalink
|
Comments
To submit a comment, please click here.