There's more money than you think in that tattoo
Reed claims the focus on Wallace's tattoo in the ad constitutes copyright infringement. He's seeking, among other things, what he sees as his "share of the revenue realized by Mr. Wallace for his exploitation of the co-owned artwork." Hmmm. Wonder how you'd calculate that? —Posted by Catharine P. Taylor |
|
February 18, 2005 | Permalink |
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
i think thats a load of crap and you wasted your time writing it.
Posted by: stacey | Oct 25, 2006 7:46:30 PM
Hi, nice post. I have been wondering about this topic,so thanks for sharing. I will certainly be subscribing to your blog.
Posted by: runescape accounts | Jul 5, 2009 10:45:50 PM

Tattoo artists









