Gap can’t fill Sarah Jessica void

Gap_sjp2New York women were aghast last week when news broke that the Gap was no longer going to use Sarah Jessica Parker, the Sex and the City style maven, in its advertising. (Joss Stone, a 17-year-old British soul singer, will star in the upcoming campaign for the summer white-denim line.) Well, maybe not all New York women were aghast—but at least four of them were, as they sipped pear martinis and sampled sushi at a trendy Japanese restaurant in the Meatpacking District during a Saturday night birthday party. In a scene oddly reminiscent of Sex and the City, the four discussed Parker’s latest, and apparently last, commercial for the ailing retailer, in which she tapped her Broadway roots, singing “Enjoy Being a Girl” in an endearing song and dance promoting “khakis with a feminine flair.” “I love that commercial,” gushed one diner. “What is the Gap thinking? She’s a fashion icon!” wailed another. “Sarah Jessica Parker was the only good thing Gap had going for it,” a third concluded as the talk turned to the Gap’s current reputation for poor quality and uninspired designs—and a friend in Montreal’s decision to boycott the clothier because of its marketing decision. No one at the table seemed cheered up that Parker was paid $38 million for her three-season stint. Maybe it was the fact that Parker just turned 40 and her replacement is just 17. Or that the birthday candle in front of them was melting the green-tea ice cream. But mostly it was the fact that the beloved actress, a Square Pegs nerd turned fashion diva, was no longer going to be gracing TV screens with her radiant personality, unless you count Sex and the City reruns on TBS.

—Posted by Eleftheria Parpis

March 29, 2005 in Parpis | Permalink

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.



I guess your sample of NYC women will have to be satisfied with their Sex in the City reruns or DVDs. Perhaps Sarah Jessica Parker is suffering a bit from overepxosure or maybe, just maybe, she didn't help the Gap sales results. There could be no other reason to let the Diva go.

Posted by: Barry Silverstein | Apr 5, 2005 2:06:37 PM

If the Gap couldn't afford the likes of Sarah, they should've never gone there in the first place. As a very successful twenty-something whose shopped on and off at Gap since I was 13, I will never buy another article of theirs again. Not renewing her contract just before her 40th birthday was the most ill-conceived decision Gap ever made. They must think American women are denser than plutonium when in actuality, their marketing people are. I am forced to presume these idiots believe 13 year olds control the fashion purse strings of this nation. Well look out Gap, I hear a death rattle... Best luck to you Sarah, you are 40 and fabulous!

Posted by: Jane G. Silver Spring MD | Apr 24, 2005 12:19:44 AM

I think it was GREAT that they had her as their star. I loved the ads. She brings a flare and chic sense of style to everything she touches. The fact that she was a Broadway sweetheart makes her even more fantastic. I think it is crazy that Gap would let go of this big star. I am not a fan of GAP clothes but I actually went in because the items they showed on her were very trendy.

Posted by: Kelly G | Nov 1, 2005 12:26:32 AM


Post a comment





The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

 
© 2009 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.