TV makes you smarter, so don't bother reading this
So apparently, I'm smarter than I thought. According to this article in last Sunday's New York Times Magazine some of the new television shows are conditioning us to think smarter than our couch potato forebears. According to the lengthy piece (and if someone can make sense of the graphs, please explain them because they seem like a lot of gibberish to me—I must not be watching enough television), today's shows, like 24 , The Sopranos and even ER are better than simplistic shows of the past like Gunsmoke and Dragnet because they carry multiple story threads and jargon to make them seem more "realistic." (I'd add to the modern-day list HBO's Deadwood, which I have to watch twice in order to discern plot from profanity.) As a counterpoint, Slate TV critic Dana Stevens says perhaps we should honor TV Turn Off Week—which began yesterday—and see if we get dumber. I propose the opposite: check your IQ here and then watch the genius box nonstop for a week and check it again.
—Posted by Aaron Baar
|
|
April 27, 2005 | Permalink
|
Comments
Johnson's argument is full of holes. Let's not fool ourselves. TV is too much like advertising to make you smart.
Here's a pretty in-depth critique, for anyone curious:
DOES WATCHING TV MAKE YOU STUPID?
(Or just stupid enough to buy Steven Johnson's premise?)
http://blog.stayfreemagazine.org/2005/05/steven_johnson_.html
Posted by: carrie | May 1, 2005 10:17:41 PM
Post a comment
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.