Sorrell paying the big bucks in divorce

Martinsorrell_creditgraham_trottIt hasn’t been a good week for WPP CEO Martin Sorrell when it comes to women. First was the fallout sparked by WPP creative guru Neil French’s derogatory remarks about females in advertising. Now come the details about Sorrell’s divorce settlement. The very competitive Sorrell has always been keenly interested in WPP becoming the industry’s largest player, which it briefly was after the acquisition of Young & Rubicam in 2000. (WPP is currently No. 2, behind Omnicom.) But this is one situation in which being the biggest is a boast Sorrell probably would have preferred not to make: In what is said to be the most costly marital payout in U.K. history, Sorrell’s wife, Sandra, stands to receive $54 million in cash, property and other assets as they dissolve their 33-year union. Among some of the juicier details are the former Lady Sorrell’s receipt of two underground parking spaces at Harrod’s. The 24-page British High Court divorce document contains embarrassing revelations about a man who enjoys the perks and power of running an $11.6 billion global company: In his own Knightsbridge mansion, Sorrell was banished to living in the basement as his marriage broke down.

—Posted by Tim Nudd

Photo: Graham Trott

October 25, 2005 in Martin Sorrell | Permalink

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.



How is moving into the basement embarrassing? He could've thrown her out on her lazy, crap ass. It's actually kind of chivalrous.

Posted by: Neil French | Oct 26, 2005 10:58:59 AM

My question is this. How the hell does this meet the criteria of news worthy. I thought AdAge should have been ashamed of themselves for sensationalizing this thing. It has no business being reported on in a trade/business journal. If they want to go to the likes of the National Inquirer, fine, but at least be honest about it.

Posted by: Peter D. | Oct 26, 2005 12:26:40 PM

Peter D.,

Huh? This is advertising we're talking about. The more sordid the details the better.

I, for one, am pleased that one our leading trade journals would share this story of personal agony. I find it much more interesting than the latest dross from one of WPP's agencies.

Posted by: David Burn | Oct 26, 2005 2:52:07 PM

more gossip! more questions!! who is he leaving her for?? the lithe 19-year old college intern? the sultry sophisticated account exec? how was he caught cheating??? inquiring minds do want to know!

Posted by: alex k | Oct 27, 2005 2:16:45 PM


Post a comment





The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

 
© 2009 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.