U.K. journalist to burn all his branded stuff
I’m not sure I’d be brave enough (or dumb enough) to burn all of my branded possessions. Without my iMac, I’d get no work done. Without my Skechers, I’d be digging NYC glass out of my feet. Without my Scientific-Atlanta DVR, I’d miss The Sopranos every week. Neil Boorman doesn’t care about things like this. A self-described “label-obsessed journalist and music promoter,” based in the U.K., Boorman is planning to build an enormous bonfire this summer, with every last piece of his branded stuff as fuel, and set it gloriously alight. Sure, he has a book deal to go along with this stunt (title: Bonfire of the Brands), but maybe he’s half-serious about how lost he feels in the sea of modern brands. Thus, on August 26 of this year, “I am going to gather every branded possession of mine into a warehouse, douse them with petrol and burn the lot,” he writes. “Jacobson chairs, Christian Dior shirts, a Louis Vuitton bag; I’m too frightened to calculate the financial cost of this action, but I know it’s a lot. Far more unsettling than the money is the emotional cost I’m going to suffer. You see, It’s not simply a pile of expensive clothes and accessories going on the bonfire. Neil Boorman is being destroyed too. … Until recently, I thought I knew who Neil Boorman was. I felt sure how the outside world regarded me because I had spent a fair amount of time engineering an image. I found the best way to understand and articulate ‘me’ was through the owning and displaying of things made by brands. They provided a source of comfort, a reassurance of my own self-worth, they project my identity to others around me. … Frustratingly, this attempt at branded self-identity has been accompanied with a numbed sense of dissatisfaction. Attempting to cure myself, I have sought comfort and reassurance by buying yet more branded goods, treating myself ‘because I’m worth it.’ I now understand that this behavior only made matters worse. For all the time and money I have devoted to collecting these brands, these symbols of self, I have absolutely no idea who I am. ... With every new emblem of identity I add to my collection, I lose a piece of myself to the brands. They cannot reciprocate the love I give. They cannot transport me to the places I’m promised exist. I am not, nor will I ever be remotely similar to the people that appear in their ads. It is a lie, a lie I have believed in for too long.” He’ll presumably be knitting his own clothes for the occasion.
—Posted by Tim Nudd
|
|
May 26, 2006 | Permalink
|
Comments
Sounds like Boorman should throw Brand Boorman on the fire.
Posted by: Alan Christensen | May 26, 2006 9:44:16 AM
Oh gawd. I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Posted by: DuaneWayne | May 26, 2006 10:10:28 AM
deep..
Posted by: cube | May 26, 2006 10:13:52 AM
since every product made is branded, is he burning the check from the book deal (branded by the book company and the bank that issued it) and all his cash (branded by the government)?
Posted by: Wally | May 26, 2006 1:04:20 PM
Sheesh, at least donate it to charity or something. Burning it all is a huge waste of resources and contributes to pollution...
Posted by: Chris | May 26, 2006 8:59:41 PM
Can he make sure he burns his paper, pens, pencils and anything else he uses to communicate his self-induced petulance?
So he woke up one day and found out the way he had been defining himself was flawed. Do we all have to watch him flog himself?
Perhaps 30 days down on the Gulf Coast razing damaged homes and rebuilding neighborhoods wrecked by Kartina might give him more soul nourishment that this waste of lighter fluid and a match.
But what would he wear? You just can't make this stuff up.....
Posted by: Jim Osterman | May 27, 2006 5:03:04 PM
Shades of Fight Club.
Posted by: Rick Daly | May 28, 2006 10:33:27 AM
What brand of matches will he use?
Posted by: Steve-oh | May 30, 2006 5:04:43 AM
He should try selling his book with a totally blank cover and let's see how many copies make it from the shelf to the register. Lame.
And doesn't he realize that even anarchists, socialists, and other groups outside the mainstream of society, have their own branded objects of identity (like Doc Martens, piercings, etc). It's not the object. It's the person. If his whole sense of self revolved around highly branded materialism, then that says more about his own lack of depth than something rotten with the products themselves.
Posted by: Garrett | May 31, 2006 2:33:01 PM
neil made his point clear - Brands are evil!
Posted by: xgeronimo | Sep 27, 2006 9:59:47 AM
Post a comment
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.