Glacéau mixed up about body-image issues?

GlaceauFor some reason, Glacéau, the maker of Vitamin Water, is comfortable showing this image on its Web site but feels that a fully clothed Kelly Clarkson would be too repulsive to appear in its advertising. Glacéau reportedly thinks Clarkson is too fat, so the singer has been put on a strict all-organic diet before she can promote kiwi- and strawberry-flavored “Focus” Vitamin Water. When Clarkson is old and wrinkly and wants to get naked for the camera, perhaps then Glacéau will cut her some slack. UPDATE: We’ve gotten an e-mail from the PR folks at Glacéau denying that they wanted Clarkson to lose weight and ripping the New York Post for spreading the rumor. It reads, in part: “The news that ran on Page Six could not be further from the truth and is completely FALSE. As it turns out, it was the reporter’s first day working for the paper and she forgot to fact check the contents before running the story! We know that Page Six isn’t the most credible source for news. ... Needless to say, we think Kelly is beautiful, healthy and has looked to Vitamin Water for years because it works for her. Vitamin Water has always provided Kelly with the nutrients she needs to lead a healthy lifestyle and we are thrilled and proud to be working with her.”

—Posted by Tim Nudd

July 11, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c51c053ef00d834a05a3753ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Glacéau mixed up about body-image issues? :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.



Man, and I thought that scene in "Swimming Pool" was jarring...

Posted by: CorruptedJournalist | Jul 11, 2006 12:49:09 PM

So hot...

Posted by: Paul McEnany | Jul 11, 2006 6:31:45 PM

Considering the record of the New York Post and its TV sibbling Fox News, I'm not surprised the story was made-up.

Posted by: | Jul 12, 2006 11:45:39 AM

Not to mention this is a picture from an old IKEA ad.

Posted by: | Jul 13, 2006 5:53:04 PM

If the NY Post item was so off-base, has there been, if not an actual retraction or a corrective notice, a "clarification" of some sort?

Posted by: Dean Speir | Jul 13, 2006 6:05:08 PM


Post a comment





The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

 
© 2009 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.