Maybe the big pharmaceutical companies should be sponsoring pro cycling
The news that Tour de France champ Floyd Landis failed a doping test has caused lots of fans to wonder if any top cyclists don’t use cocktails of performance-enhancing drugs. Fallout may come from sponsors, too, which after all pay the bills for the Tour. Landis’ team sponsor, Phonak, weirdly enough a Swiss manufacturer of hearing aids, was already dropping its name from the team and is due to be replaced by Barclays Global Investors’ iShares. Taking a quick glance at a list of Tour sponsors, it seems like there’s little rhyme or reason to what kind of companies get involved. There’s telecommunications (T-Mobile), IT (CSC), media (Discovery), even a maker of hot-water heaters (Saunier Duval-Prodir). Who knows how many will stick around. Maybe cycling should look to more relevant sponsors: the pharmaceutical companies themselves. Amgen, the maker of cyclists’ favorite drug, red-blood-cell booster erythropoietin, is already sponsoring a big cycling club complete with snazzy jerseys dotted with the red blood cells endurance athletes crave. It even became the title sponsor of the Tour of California last year. And if iShares gets cold feet, perhaps Oscient Pharmaceuticals would step in. Oscient makes Testim, a handy cream for getting an extra shot of T.
—Posted by Brian Morrissey
|
|
July 28, 2006 in Morrissey | Permalink
|
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c51c053ef00d8345fc7f869e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Maybe the big pharmaceutical companies should be sponsoring pro cycling:
» acyclovir from acyclovir
[Read More]
Tracked on Aug 10, 2006 4:31:58 AM
Comments
Rather than comment on cheating in sports, or in the financial industry, or in some latest James Frey book...how about commenting on cheating in the industry Adfreak actually covers?
We're in an industry that is already beginning to lose respect from within it's own creative ranks. Cheating is rampant in Advertsing's creative award shows. And though there is a lot of lip service paid to eradicating it--it still goes on, probably more so than ever before--with some people build very lucrative careers off of it.
So why not tackle that? Why not suggest an independent group headed by creative leaders with a proven track record of integrity to verify winners in top ad shows as completely legit?
Or is all this talk of fairness, ethics and accountability supposed fly out the window once we get to advertising?
Posted by: Justathought | Jul 28, 2006 5:40:25 PM
Post a comment
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.