Is it time for Showtime to quit charging?
With so many original hit shows on Showtime these days, it’s hard to remember the premium channel’s 1990s tagline, “Nothing but RoboCop and soft-core skin flicks.” OK, so maybe they never came right out and admitted it like that, but the fact remains that Showtime has pulled off an impressive evolution into the best paid channel that no one’s watching. Public-radio icon Ira Glass recently said fans constantly tell him they would watch the TV version of This American Life, if only they subscribed to Showtime. (The series is now available on iTunes for $1.99 an episode.) And this week, Showtime stopped just short of celebrating when new episodes of Weeds turned up on illegal file-sharing sites. “I’m excited it’s out there,” says Weeds creator Jenji Kohan. “Showtime is great, but it does have a limited audience.” So will Showtime’s success end up destroying its own ad-free model? Maybe there could be a Showtime Lite that’s free for cable subscribers. The network could retain its core audience by continuing to charge for shows like Catfight Bordello 2: Clash of the Cream Corn Vixens. Until then, I approve of their interim plan: ads featuring Mary-Louise Parker and Fox Mulder, nekkid and eatin’ apples.
—Posted by David Griner
|
|
August 6, 2007 in Griner, Showtime | Permalink
|
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c51c053ef00e3982357b38833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is it time for Showtime to quit charging?:
Comments
You got schooled.
http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/adfreak-what-the-hell-are-you-talking-about/
Posted by: Kathy R. | Aug 6, 2007 5:50:39 PM
I've posted a response over there. I don't quite get why it sounds like we disagree. I think Agency Spy makes valid points about the inevitability of file sharing. I wasn't really getting into that with my post, but it definitely gets at the long-term weakness of a premium-cable model.
Posted by: DavidGriner | Aug 6, 2007 7:45:57 PM
Get this! I don't have cable tv, I still use the "rabbit ears" antenna. I see cable stations at friends homes and they tape things for me. SHeesh! the commercials, with all the revenue they get from commercials why do subscribers have to pay anything!
Posted by: Rabbit Ears | Aug 7, 2007 5:24:27 AM
Post a comment
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.