Lingerie maker ties up Maggie Gyllenhaal
—Posted by Tim Nudd |
|
September 4, 2007 | Permalink |
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
her face is so icky.
Posted by: | Sep 4, 2007 11:47:24 PM
Her face actually looks like an old creative director of mine. That's creepy. However, the lower half is nice.
Posted by: thatguy | Sep 6, 2007 2:27:27 PM
As long as they keep doing less ads with anorexic, coke-snorting prima donnas it's fine with me.
Posted by: Hi Mum | Sep 10, 2007 3:36:45 AM
Maggie is the best!
Also, her face is beautiful, so to whoever posted the icky comment you have extremely bad taste!
Posted by: Melinda | Sep 11, 2007 1:13:39 AM
She is ugly! Period. How old is she? She looks to be way past 40. She's pasty white and isn't the least bit sexy. She looks too old to be doing these types of ads. The need to get someone younger, prettier and sexier.
Posted by: Vee | Sep 11, 2007 2:18:38 PM
Pure sex, she does it well. you must not be very experienced, look and learn.
Posted by: rccsv | Sep 11, 2007 2:50:05 PM
I think they're some jealous women on here making statements.
Posted by: tomjefferson2005 | Sep 11, 2007 3:03:04 PM
i wish my body looked like that, but i'm sure glad my face doesn't!!!!
Posted by: mel | Sep 11, 2007 3:13:05 PM
They chose the worst one for this article. Click on the pic and see the others...this one doesn't do her nay favors...the others do.
Posted by: db | Sep 11, 2007 3:28:38 PM
For whomever thinks her face looks good, please go get your eyeballs checked. This is horrible makeup artistry UNLESS the objective is to make her look like a captured sex slave. She looks awful in the face.... sad too... and very uncomfortable with this work.
Posted by: angel | Sep 11, 2007 3:29:36 PM
I agree w/ Mel the other pics are MUCH better. Why did they pic this one?
Posted by: Tra | Sep 11, 2007 3:57:09 PM
I'd look like that too after being airbrushed.
Posted by: lola | Sep 11, 2007 4:40:35 PM
She definitely has an icky face. I wouldn't do her. LOL.
Posted by: Tom | Sep 11, 2007 4:54:49 PM
I'd boink her !
Posted by: Are-jay | Sep 11, 2007 5:39:07 PM
Haell... It's been so long since I had good 5ex I forgot who gets tied up !
Posted by: Are-jay | Sep 11, 2007 5:40:25 PM
I have one word to say about these photos: AIRBRUSH!
Posted by: fiftyfabulous | Sep 11, 2007 5:41:32 PM
Can you not see that the reason that corset is on there is to hide the belly that I am sure is still bulging out there.. DUH.. do you think I am falling for that? if she is so thin after this baby show me some skin, then I will believe it!
Posted by: Rhonda | Sep 11, 2007 6:20:43 PM
Where is her face corset?
Posted by: baldeaze | Sep 11, 2007 6:22:28 PM
She is not attractive. Her face looks like droopy, that dog from the cartoons. If I got home and saw this chick waiting for me tied up in that outfit, I would move out.
Posted by: RazorEater | Sep 11, 2007 6:28:07 PM
Her brother is a pretty good looking guy, what in the hell happend to her ?!!! What a mess.
Posted by: RazorEater | Sep 11, 2007 6:30:03 PM
Nices to see all the cats with their fangs out, Hell I would throw her out of bed, theres more room on the floor, what a bunch of catty bitches.
Buffalo
Posted by: Bob | Sep 11, 2007 6:57:20 PM
I like the pic I think she looks like a classic beauty and I'm happy that she's not all anorexic looking.
Posted by: Keya | Sep 11, 2007 7:04:58 PM
Oh Puleeze!! Anyone can look good 6 months after giving birth with photoshop and a corset covering just the right place.
Posted by: ctx3 | Sep 11, 2007 7:08:44 PM
I would GLADLEY take her without the corset and photoshop. Agreed there are some jealous women here....... Shame. Bet their hubbies or boyfriends don't have much fun.....
Posted by: Rounder | Sep 11, 2007 7:50:40 PM
If it is a photoshop I still think it's pretty.
Posted by: Keya | Sep 13, 2007 12:22:21 AM
