« Americans say humbug to ‘Happy holidays’ | Main | TV is good for you and your whole family »

Firebrand sizzles, but visitors get doused

Firebrand Long before Firebrand launched last night, the all-commercials Web site and TV show had already been debated ad nauseam. I personally don’t buy most of the arguments against Firebrand. (“It’s too much like YouTube,” “No one wants to watch commercials,” etc.) But now that I’ve been watching it for a while, I do have my own bone to pick. First, let me say, it’s hands-down the most elegantly designed and organized ad collection in the world. And yet there’s no way to comment on what you’re watching. This is especially bizarre, since Firebrand’s been championed by conversational-marketing guru Joseph Jaffe. Yes, they give you the code to embed any spot on your own comments-enabled site, and that’s great. But to have so much content in one magnificent space without the ability to weigh in yourself? That’s taking the TV-network model way too far (into the past), and it might be too late if they get around to adding a comment function after the kickoff buzz dies. I continue to have hope for Firebrand, which is still in its beta phase. That said, if they hang on to that horrendous blee-bloo noise between ads, they’ll deserve an especially dingy spot in the dustbin of history.

—Posted by David Griner

November 27, 2007 in Griner | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think not adding comments was a wise idea. Constructive criticism or reasoned debate is incredibly rare on YouTube, where the comments box is usually filled with the most inane, irrelevant crap I've ever seen.

Posted by: A | Nov 27, 2007 5:33:52 PM

YouTube's comment box is junk. But there is a way to allow commentary and criticism while filtering out the trolls and flame baiters. We're about to launch our Beta site, which is essentially Firebrand with voting, commenting, and criticism. Check it out!

Posted by: Bill Nones | Nov 27, 2007 8:46:55 PM

Isn't the reason Joseph Jaffe championed this service because he's being PAID by the company. This really doesn't count as an endorsement and just goes to further blur the line between Jaffe's whoring for sponsorships and any editorial credibility he may have once had.

Posted by: Jason Frommer | Nov 28, 2007 12:00:51 AM

Post a comment





The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

 
© 2009 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.