U.K. child-abuse ads don't skimp on gore
—Posted by David Kiefaber
|
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Yeow!
Posted by: Woody Hinkle | Feb 7, 2008 11:52:05 AM
Good God.
Posted by: Adwriter | Feb 7, 2008 11:53:47 AM
and i thought the aussie no school speeding ads were gross...man britain, it cant be that bad can it :o
Posted by: glenn | Feb 7, 2008 5:08:25 PM
Nice. Now THAT's the way to sell cause marketing.
Posted by: Bobby | Feb 7, 2008 6:00:25 PM
Oh dear lord that is scary. The first one you show is the best, the others simply variants.
Posted by: Dabitch | Feb 8, 2008 5:13:16 AM
Please note that this is not an official NSPCC advert. We will be contacting the owner of this blog to correct this inaccuarcy. Thank you.
Emily Knee, NSPCC Brand Communications.
Posted by: Emily Knee | Feb 8, 2008 5:48:27 AM
Yawn.
Too easy. Nothing new to see here. Blood by a baby toy. Next, show us the blood by a dog chewie toy for animal abuse. Blood by a walker for elderly abuse.
No unexpected ideas here.
Posted by: Sean | Feb 8, 2008 9:46:16 AM
Really, I understand the cause and back the overall message of the ads. It's just an incredibly crass way of getting a message across. These come off as Ad School spec work (which they may actually be) created by an AD who hasn't yet refined their approach.
Has been done before and better (smarter).
Posted by: james | Feb 8, 2008 10:09:40 AM
They may have done those adverts or not but what is sure is that they are damn good pestering people on the street (whom by the way, get pai 7.50 an hour)
Posted by: john | Feb 22, 2008 4:14:33 PM
im happy people are trying to reach out and prevent child abuse. but seriously blood on the bibs and toy. show us something we'll actually have nightmares about.
Posted by: kathrine | May 19, 2009 1:20:52 AM
i think they are horrible but at least they will get the point across.
Posted by: shanice | Jul 7, 2009 7:46:09 AM
