Don't laugh at the chimp in the commercial
—Posted by Tim Nudd |
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
We only cast chimps after most of the actors we cast can't play the part right. Chimpers are Uber-Actors. A solid go-to. Like dogs and babies.
Posted by: Tim | Mar 14, 2008 12:30:59 PM
Tim, your tongue-in-cheek post is exactly the kind of childishness Ross is advocating against.
The chimpanzee, our closest living relative, could very well become extinct within our lifetime.
Let that sink in for a moment before heading back to YouTube-land.
Posted by: Carl | Mar 14, 2008 1:24:44 PM
Yet, in my defense...
http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2006/03/should_advertis.html
Posted by: Tim Nudd | Mar 14, 2008 2:04:40 PM
Let me make sure I understand this— Steve Ross wants people to know that Chimpanzees are endangered, and to help their cause he doesn't want people to be entertained by them, endeared to them on TV, and that the best way to help the Chimpanzees is... to remove them from our social fabric?
I'm sure his intentions are good, but he's clearly clueless.
Posted by: Chris Grayson - GigantiCo | Mar 14, 2008 6:34:06 PM
Tim - Contributions to save the species are certainly welcome from the industry, but this study points out the industry is ALSO contributing to the mis-education of the public regarding that species. It doesn't have to be that way.
Chris - Ross isn't calling for chimpanzees to be removed from the social fabric, afterall he works at a zoo where people can connect with chimpanzees. He's simply sharing evidence he gathered linking the public's misunderstanding of chimpanzees and their misrepresentation in advertising.
This should be a victory for all marketers out there: more proof that advertising is effective. People are buying into the message. Only now, that message needs to change.
Posted by: Carl | Mar 17, 2008 10:54:16 AM












