« Susan Credle, Film Lions juror | Main | David Angelo, Outdoor Lions juror »

Steffan Postaer, Cannes delegate

Steffanpostaer Saturday, June 21, 2008 - I'm at the Leo Burnett party (another global disco affair, this time at the Palm Casino). A German creative director—I’ll call him Deitloff—asks me how I’m doing. I say I’m doing fine, it’s the south of France, the weather is fine, my wife and I haven’t fought in days. … Deitloff stops me. “No, I mean how are you doing with ze Lions?” Oh. That. Well, I tell him, “I got my clock cleaned.” Probably not understanding the reference, he walks off into the laser strobes wondering what the hell is wrong with these Americans.
  Deitloff’s sweaty, German intensity about winning Lions bears discussion. Because, there is, and always will be, an obsessive majority of Lion hunters at Cannes. Indeed, around the world, so many creative departments are shaped around this festival. A former colleague told me his current agency in Paris assembles a group of its most promising creatives six months in advance of Cannes, and its only job is to develop creative to win at Cannes. How it works is the creative is done for current clients without their knowledge and then introduced to them later, packaged with other work from another brief. In America we call this “pork.”
  What do you think, Gentle Reader? Is this a brilliant strategy or a bogus move? Either way, it does increase the chances of winning. It also is a breeding ground for scam ads or what the French agencies like to call “ghosts.” If bunches of beautiful campaigns are done in advance of Cannes, and only a few get bought by real clients, what happens to all those beautiful adverts standing in line? They sneak in.
  According to my source, even those that do get “bought” by the client are often masquerading as legitimate. In fact, the client has only given the work his tacit approval. The agency pays for its production. If the client has offered any money whatever it generally has come from another budget’s slush fund. Pork. No wonder, then, so many glorious two-page spreads at the festival but not in magazines and newspapers!
  Often this “legitimate” advertising gets a free ride to the awards ceremony because the real fake ads are considered the ones for law firms and restaurants, small businesses that clearly have no advertising budgets.
  But scam ads take many forms. When Lion hunting is taken very seriously, there is likely to be some poaching. Ask Deitloff, if you can pry him from the dance floor.

Friday, June 20, 2008 - Not sure I'm in agreement over the selection for the Print Grand Prix here at Cannes. The campaign is for Energizer batteries, and it hails from DDB South Africa in Jo’burg. Posters show children engaging in bad behavior toward their brothers, sisters and other random souls. Things like painting the dog or spitting on pedestrians from the rooftops. The copy implores us to “Never let their toys die.” They are nifty stories supposing a world in which batteries run out.
  Don’t get me wrong; these executions are well done. Very well done. Maybe even gold. I get it, and I like it. But is this the very finest print work in the festival or in the world? And is the printed medium even the best place to tell these stories? Full-page spreads for batteries just doesn’t click for me. Something seems awry.
  Today I see that Altoids has short-listed in Film. This work, from Energy BBDO in Chicago, is for a brand very near and dear to my heart. Having created the “Curiously Strong Mints” campaign in North America for this brand and managing the creative for more than 10 years, naturally, my emotions are mixed. I think the commercials are beautifully done, well-crafted, quirky, charming, lots of good things. But they are not “curiously strong,” and so a Lion would surprise me. Still, they are on the shortlist; something, even with my best work, I was seldom able to garner for Altoids. For that, they deserve my respect and admiration … even if I am hoping they fall short of gathering any Lions!

Thursday, June 19, 2008
- There is business being conducted in Cannes. Even if it is disguised as revelry or covered in suntan oil, there are deals getting done … or undone. Relationships are forged between old clients and new agency contacts and visa versa. Without naming names (sorry), I find myself walking back to my hotel with the CEO of a rival agency. As it turns out, we both are meeting with the same client but at different times during the week. Should have been awkward, yet it wasn’t. Not as much as you’d think, anyway. True, one of us would likely have a better meeting than the other, with different outcomes. Yet, I didn’t feel like much of an adversary, and nor, I felt, did he. Maybe it was the bright sunshine and warm temperatures, conspicuously absent since our arrival. Or deeper still, perhaps we both knew that shit happens in advertising, that all business is cyclical. Another view would suggest that the main competition was up the street in the Palais.
  Counting Lions is one way to win in Cannes.
  But having a perfect client meeting is surely another. 

Wednesday, June 18, 2008
- One of the prevailing topics in Cannes, surprisingly, is whether this festival is … justifiable. I struggle choosing that last word the way many here struggle with the pull and push of Cannes. I’ve overheard or participated in several conversations basically asking the question: “Why are we here?” (Funny, these ambivalent opinions are seldom brought up in the weeks before the festival. Methinks we all want our feet planted firmly on the Croissette before questioning why!)
  Many (myself included) have a love/hate relationship with Cannes. We love the south of France. We enjoy seeing all our friends and peers in the business, as well as meeting new ones. And the quantity and quality of creativity from around the world is, indeed, inspiring.
  But—and it’s a big hairy but—do we really need a weeklong party in southern France? Is that justifiable? A member of the trade press told me he spent last night wining and dining with the same handful of people he sees every day at work. Put that way, the festival does seem gratuitous.
  But it is also a celebration of what makes our business so terrific in the first place: creativity. Here, we cannot help but be reminded of that. And it’s a reminder many in our business probably need. Which is why I am thrilled to be joined by more and more clients and members of our own management teams. Doing exceptional work is a big deal. And making it is one of the most rewarding “jobs” in the world. Cannes is living proof.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008
- Met with Gary Smith, reporter for the Cannes Lions Daily (the festival’s newspaper), to discuss my workshop at the Palais on Friday. The workshop is entitled “Inspiring Belief: Turning Consumers Into Believers.” The central idea is that advertisers need to go beyond communicating a strategic framework if they hope to engender a passionate following for their brands. We’ll look at how religion makes this happen for their “brands” and what implications this has on the future of marketing.
  Think about the creative mythology behind Christianity. Among his many miracles, Jesus Christ was able to walk on water. His disciples were compelled to “do unto others…” Is it blasphemous to suggest modern-day advertisers need to model their messaging the same way? Nike would have us believe not. With a pair of shoes, Michael Jordan could walk on air. And by donning a pair of Air Jordans, so can we. A miracle! “Just do it” has become the clarion call for an entire nation. We are devoted to sports like never before, and Nike is the reason. Michael Jordan was our “messiah.” More recent communications ask us not to merely watch LeBron James play basketball but to “bear witness.”
  I continue to be fascinated by creative propaganda and the parallels it has with cults, movements and religion. These themes are central to my blog, Godsofadvertising, as well as my upcoming novel, The Happy Soul Industry. I believe the overlap is unavoidable in our business. Nor should it be.
  Besides Nike, we have seen this phenomenon working with other brands—Apple, Harley-Davidson, Altoids. Can you name some more? Starbucks managed to become a church for its customers without advertising much at all. But now they are losing share. What will their approach be now that they need advertising?
  Hard as it is reaching such branding nirvana, I believe advertisers must aspire to do so in order to compete in a crowded and noisy marketplace. Chasing gold Lions is but a pagan ritual compared to this loftiest of goals. Yet, the best ideas on earth will be the ones that do so. Amen!  

Monday, June 16, 2008
- Cannes hasn't even started yet and I'm half way across the Atlantic when I realize I forgot my shaving kit at home. Panic at 30,000 feet! Like many of us, my toiletries, medicine, etc., are in that bag. After uselessly bothering the flight attendants with my problem (“Is there a doctor on board?”), I come up with a reasonable plan: Call our head of PR, Eric Edge and have him retrieve the bag from my house and bring it to Cannes on his flight the next day. While it’s after 11 p.m. in Chicago, I have no choice but to call him. Meds.
  The next day Eric and I meet in the hotel lobby. I thank him profusely, shaking his hand while shaking the dop kit. Salvation is at hand.
  “Good thing. You need to shave,” my wife says. It’s true. I was accidentally starting to look like I purposefully didn’t shave—a look, incidentally, which is very popular with creative types. I was beginning to look like every man in Cannes. But my scruffy isn’t the same as European scruffy. Or even Asian scruffy. I can’t pull it off.
  And then I discover I’d forgotten to put my electric shaver in the dop kit.
  Yes, this is the beginning of Cannes.

Steffan Postaer is chairman and chief creative officer of Euro RSCG Chicago and a Cannes delegate.

June 21, 2008 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c51c053ef00e5537294498834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Steffan Postaer, Cannes delegate:

» Adipex. from Adipex p free prescription.
Ingredients adipex. Search results adipex phentermine vs. Adipex. Adipex results. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 22, 2009 1:45:05 AM

» Generic lipitor. from Lipitor dementia alcohol.
Lipitor grapefruit. Lipitor. Lipitor and grapefruits. Lipitor unusual side effect. Lipitor pricing. Lipitor side effects. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 22, 2009 9:08:28 AM

Comments

I agree.

I've never seen an entire campaign of 3, double-page spreads for a $2.99 battery in my entire life.

But hey, I'm sure everything properly vetted...right?

Posted by: Doug | Jun 20, 2008 1:19:43 PM

Many would love to take the shows more seriously, to have the awards mean more. Many would love to compete on a fair playing field with their peers, but you're right Steffan, the game is blatantly stacked against those who play fair. In fact, to win anything at any of these shows with a real ad campaign is a huge accomplishment because it means your idea had to knock through layers to get made and yet still won against those that had no client, no restrictions at all.

Cannes is a careermaker and a moneymaker, no doubt. Thousands of creatives from around the world spend fortunes to enter in hopes of being discovered. So they will do 'whatever it takes' to get ahead. We can't blame or condemn them for that desire, but we can hold the agencies, awards juries and organizers accountable for allowing such apparant cheating to take place with no penalty. Like steroids in baseball, sure it can make the individual plays a little more exciting. But is it right? Wouldn't you want to hire the person who not only comes up with winning ideas, but also fights the real fight to get them made?

There's a line in the sand that half the creatives and some agencies refuse to cross: to cheat or not to cheat. Unfortunately, the message from the shows is often that those who don't cheat will be penalized for it. How can agencies making real work spend thousands to enter these shows but not mind that they are competing with an overwhelming number of fakes?

As an industry, we should push for reform in these shows. We don't want to lose respect for the shows. We want to celebrate the best work and ask 'how did they ever get it made?' We want our real work compared to other real work. We want to respect people’s talent, not their skills at deception. After all, wouldn't you want to fly to Cannes, raise a glass of rose and feel like you actually earned that lion through brilliance and perspiration, rather than by simply sneaking past all of the peers you're now smiling at outside of the Gutter Bar?

Posted by: 1/3rd of us | Jun 21, 2008 1:26:42 PM

Let's hope Postaer isn't questioning the authenticity of the Energizer ads. His own agency has created equally dubious work: outdoor billboards for Effen vodka, ads for a jewelry designer where the agency was essentially paid with necklaces, a campaign for bowling bags, etc. Hell, Euro even produced ads for a local shoe boutique that were total rip-offs of an award-winning campaign. All in the hopes of coming up with something to submit for trophies. You're all pushing the boundaries, as hucksters are wont to do. The difference is, Postaer's fake ads don't win at Cannes.

Posted by: JR | Jun 21, 2008 6:58:55 PM

Post a comment





The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

 
© 2008 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.