« Fox joins Twitter in banners trend | Main | Tweets of the Day: @bogusky »


Twit of the Week: Shiv Singh

Picture 11 Each week we conduct a Q&A over Twitter (using the #tweetfreak hashtag) with a top marketing or media person using the service. This week Adweek's Brian Morrissey (@bmorrissey) exchanged tweets with Shiv Singh, (@shivsingh), Razorfish's social media lead and recent author of the agency's Fluent social media  report.

Q:  What’s one myth you encounter when it comes to brands and social media?

I'd say that participating opens up the brands to greater risks than it is worth. Usually it’s the opposite.

Q: How about on the social media expert side? What does it miss when it comes to big brands?
That social media equals PR but with a different channel. That completely misses the point and needs to be refuted always.

Q: Razorfish’s recent social media study says top-down branding getting impotent, but TV ads still have high consumer trust ratings. Is there a disconnect?
While consumers trust TV, they depend on each other for advice. Trust in offline friends was double that of TV. Offline friends was defined in the survey as friendships that started offline and continued online in social media platforms. People we meet online aren't considered that trustworthy as yet. Understandable - we're still not sure if they're all authentic!

Q: So our online 'friends' are like second or third-class friends. Will that necessarily change?

Yes, that's what the research shows. You don't trust people you meet online as much as friends who've joined you online. It may change as our online identities become more traceable too. I'll trust a stranger I meet online if he is searchable and I know there's a real person behind that persona. And this is where social graphs serve as a security too. And this is where social graphs serve as a security too. I'll trust you because I know someone in your graph. That's the change

Q: Razorfish and others are trying to put hard measurement against social media. Is tying social media directly to ROI possible?
Absolutely but the social media effort needs to be on a scale that's large enough to neatly allow for the ROI tie. And this 1-800 Flowers example with sales within Facebook is just the most recent direct example of that.

Q: If social media destroys top-down branding, what's the role of the ad agency?
We do much more than top down branding. Agencies will help connect consumers to brands and vice versa. Only it will be where consumers want to be connected. We'll advise brands on those relationships and how to provide great value exchanges.

July 21, 2009 in Twit of the Week | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I am not sure what side of the fence Mr. Singh resides on. The treatise on Social Media hypes the new media as the be all end all, and that top down brand messaging will become increasingly impotent. I beg to differ. Core brand strategy, and creative executions will always come from the brand creators themselves. The brand has to communicate it's unique DNA, "it's reasons to buy." Then it's customers will make an emotional connection. (if the agency gets it right.) "A diamond is forever," didn't come from SIM or anything ground level. Nor does the current brand messaging since the emergence of the new media... The new media needs to remember what it is. A vehicle just like print, collateral, and broadcast. A tool to communicate a brand. What the new media does offer-- is yet another way to reach out and touch someone in an even more personal way. A media to extend your brand, not threaten your brand. www.twitter.com/wheresyourbuzz

Posted by: john Borys | Jul 22, 2009 3:48:29 PM

Pundits abound, and it reminds me of 2000 when Nicholas Negroponte was the man of the hour. Digital was to be the paradigm shift that changed everything. It did, sort of. Rumors of the demise of print and television were a bit exagerated. Digital is a very powerful medium but it will never eclipse word of mouth – and word of mouth will always be controlled by them with a cake hole. I love this medium but I adore the users, they are in charge. The workers really do own the means of production. Every medium is only a stage for stories to be told – and if your theater is weak so to will be the reaction of its audience.

Posted by: brian | Aug 9, 2009 6:15:12 PM

Agree, the world of social media is relatively young. Landscapes are meant to change, because its users will. Interesting bit about trusting people you know that go online vs. trusting people you meet online. If only everyone on dating sites have legitimate people behind them!

Posted by: alt com | Dec 7, 2011 11:25:02 PM

Post a comment





The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or E5 Global Media. Comments of a promotional nature or comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

 
© 2010 Adweek. All rights reserved.
Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.